Economic Implication of Targeting Higher Trough Level with Extended Half-Life FVIII Prophylaxis

Authors

  • Carla Fornari Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy
  • Stefania Antonacci U.O.C. Farmacia territoriale, ASL Bari, Bari, Italy
  • Stefano Stoppa Farmacia Ospedaliera, ASST ovest milanese, Legnano, Italy
  • Lorenzo Giovanni Mantovani Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy; Laboratory of Public Health, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy
  • Giancarlo Castaman Center for Bleeding Disorders and Coagulation Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy
  • Paolo Angelo Cortesi Research Centre on Public Health (CESP), University of Milano-Bicocca, Monza, Italy; Laboratory of Public Health, IRCCS Istituto Auxologico Italiano, Milan, Italy

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.7175/fe.v27i1.1604

Keywords:

Hemophilia A, Prophylaxis, rFVIII, pharmacokinetic , Health economics

Abstract

AIM: This analysis aimed to assess the annual International Unit (IU) consumption and costs of prophylaxis therapies with extended half-life recombinant FVIII (EHL-rFVIII), targeting a traditional trough level of 1% and the higher levels of 3% and 5% recommended by recent guidelines and expert consensus, using a theoretical pharmacokinetic model.

METHODS: A pharmacokinetic model was developed to calculate annual treatment IU consumption and costs of EHL-rFVIII products to sustain different trough levels (1%, 3% and 5%) in adult patients with hemophilia A in Italy. The model assumed a one-year perspective and assessed two scenarios: one with lower frequency of administration and one with higher frequency.

RESULTS: The related annual treatment per-patient cost increased as the trough level increased. The per-patient annual cost was €117,811 to achieve a trough level of 1%, €351,543 to achieve a 3% trough level and €585,905 to achieve a 5% trough level. The increase in dose frequency (alternative scenario), that is the reduction of time between infusions, reduced the estimated doses to achieve the pre-defined FVIII levels.

CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest the need for further discussion about the trough levels to target with the actual EHL-rFVIII and the prophylaxis dose and regimen selection for each patient, also considering all treatment options available and the economic implications.

Downloads

Additional Files

Published

2026-03-12

Issue

Section

Original Research

How to Cite

Economic Implication of Targeting Higher Trough Level with Extended Half-Life FVIII Prophylaxis. (2026). Farmeconomia. Health Economics and Therapeutic Pathways, 27(1). https://doi.org/10.7175/fe.v27i1.1604

Most read articles by the same author(s)

<< < 1 2 3